Sunday, January 22, 2017

Should one only sell biodynamic wines then?



The class on organic and biodynamic wines hit close to home. 

My company in Singapore imports and distributes mainly organic or biodynamic wines, but we intentionally include “normal” wines too. We did not want to exclude winegrowers who might occasionally spray some chemicals to save a crop or who did not follow biodynamic practices blindly, and at the end of the day, still made good wines which are priced reasonably. We have also unfortunately had our fair share of not-so-good organic or biodynamic wines.

It was fascinating to read the study on Alsatian wines as that has not been our experience in Singapore. Neither labels, organic or biodynamic, lead automatically to higher quality nor prices. That said, on the rare occasions we have consumer events, we have found that introducing biodynamic wines is a great way to start the engagement.

Which leads me to why the class hit close to home. This undogmatic philosophy has worked well for B2B (e.g. restaurants), but now that we are intending to expand into B2C, some have suggested that we should differentiate ourselves more sharply by selling only organic and/or biodynamic wines. We are still undecided and would love to hear the class’s views!

Finally, I wanted to share how I like to think about biodynamic practices – For me, it’s like “fengshui”! As Wikipedia puts it, “fengshui” is “a philosophical system of harmonizing everyone with the surrounding environment”. Some people swear by the science and art of “fengshui”; some think it’s kooky. That for me is a nice parallel of what biodynamic practices are and how they are regarded.

1 comment:

  1. I think this is actually a really interesting topic and one that was made even more interesting for me during class when the speaker made a clear point that while they are biodynamic in their production of their wines and Grgich but don't actually put it anywhere on the label. It seemed to me that this really negates any of the signaling benefit that the readings talked about so extensively because consumers don't know that it is even a signal they should be looking for. When asked this question he sort of punted and said it wasn't his decision and pointed back to the call his 'boss' had made years ago, but I wonder what the real benefit is they've seen from removing the classification from the label while still continuing with the extreme routine.

    ReplyDelete